The Victoria Climbie Inquiry Logo and link to home page  

 

 
 
Search
 
   
Key Documents News Update
Timetables Evidence Background FAQs Inquiry Team About Us Final Report

Terms of Referance links
Issues
Procedural Notes
Opening Statement
Funding for Legal Representation
Definition of an Interested Party
Phase One Interested Parties
Contact Between Inquiry Team Members and Witnesses
Phase one written closing submissions
Phase Two Documents
Lord Laming statement

Funding for Legal Representation

1. This note sets out the procedures the Inquiry will adopt in relation to requests for funding for legal representation from Interested Parties and Witnesses and is divided into the following sections:

Section One: The scope for legal representation in the Inquiry
This section outlines the broad areas of work for which payment of costs will be considered.

Section Two: General principles governing requests for funding
This section sets out the principles that Lord Laming will apply in considering whether to recommend to the Secretary of State that funding for legal costs should be granted.

Section Three: Applications for a recommendation for funding and the procedure for agreeing the level of funding
This section explains what Interested Parties and Witnesses should do now if they wish to make an application for legal funding, or if an application has already been made. It also sets out the information Interested Parties and Witnesses must provide to enable Lord Laming to consider whether a recommendation should be made, and arrangements for notifying Interested Parties and Witnesses of Lord Laming's recommendations and subsequent decisions of the Secretary of State.

Section Four: Billing procedures
This section tells Interested Parties and Witnesses what to do once a recommendation for funding has been accepted by the Secretary of State.

Section Five: Procedure for the assessment of costs
This section describes the process for scrutinising claims for costs and what action will be taken if a disagreement arises.


SECTION ONE: THE SCOPE FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN THE INQUIRY

2. As Lord Laming said at the preliminary meeting on Thursday 31 May 2001, the role of legal representatives for Interested Parties is likely to be limited to the following:

  • A time limited opening statement.

  • Suggesting lines of questioning to be put by counsel to the Inquiry.

  • Suggestions for additional witnesses.

  • Time limited re-examination of own witnesses.

  • Time limited final submissions.

3. It is recognised that legal representatives for Interested Parties may also be involved in the following work:

  • Consideration of the material contained in the Inquiry bundles insofar as is necessary properly to represent their client's interests.

  • Responding to notices of potential criticism.

4. The involvement of legal representatives of Witnesses is likely to be limited to the following:

  • Preparation of a witness statement.

  • Consideration of what Inquiry documents their client may need access to and consideration of such documentation.

  • Representation of the witness during their evidence.

  • Time limited re-examination of own witness.

  • Responding to notices of potential criticism.

SECTION TWO: GENERAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING REQUESTS FOR FUNDING

5. The principles that the Inquiry will apply in considering an application for a recommendation for legal funding are as follows;

(i) This is an inquisitorial Inquiry where the scope for involvement of legal representatives is limited. Applications will be considered on this basis.

(ii) Recommendations are envisaged in cases where Lord Laming decides that representation is necessary and there are no other means by which such representation can be funded. As Lord Laming stated at the preliminary meeting, he does not envisage making a recommendation in respect of any public body, any commercial concern or any substantial trade union or staff association.

(iii) All legal representatives will be expected to work in a cost-effective manner avoiding both unnecessary duplication and work not reasonably necessary to the representation of their client.

(iv) Save in exceptional circumstances, funding will only be authorised at assistant solicitor level and, if it is considered necessary to instruct counsel, at junior counsel level.

SECTION THREE: APPLICATIONS FOR A RECOMMENDATION

6. Any Interested Party or Witness who wishes to make such an application must do so immediately. They should specify the following;

  • The level of seniority of the solicitor who will deal with the case and his/her proposed hourly charging rate.

  • Where it is thought necessary to instruct counsel, the reasons for so doing, the date of call and his/her proposed hourly rate. (It is likely that the employment of counsel will only be funded on the basis of payment for time spent.)

  • The number of hours for which it is anticipated a solicitor will be engaged on Inquiry work.

  • The number of hours for which it is anticipated counsel will be engaged on Inquiry work.

  • Particulars of any other foreseeable expenses.

7. A number of Interested Parties and Witnesses have already invited Lord Laming to make a recommendation for funding. Any of those who have not already provided the above information must do so now.

8. Once the request has been considered, the applicant will be notified as to whether a recommendation for funding has been made by Lord Laming and the terms of any such recommendation.

9. The Interested Party or Witness will then be notified whether the recommendation has been accepted by the Secretary of State, and the terms on which public funding has been approved and is offered.

10. Expenditure before or in excess of such approval will not normally be recoverable.

11. It will be open to Lord Laming to make further recommendations to the Secretary of State at any stage. In particular, he may recommend, either initially or at any time (including after the acceptance of the initial recommendation by the Secretary of State), that a cap be imposed on the grant of funding for representation. This may amount to an overall financial limit and/or a limit on the number of hours to be spent on Inquiry business.

12. All public funding is subject to the condition that the Interested Party or Witness concerned agrees to be bound by the decision of the Costs Judge if the Crown chooses to refer any disputed matter to him in accordance with paragraph 16 of this note.

SECTION FOUR: BILLING PROCEDURES

13. Once an application for funding has been approved by the Secretary of State, the Interested Party or Witness concerned will be requested to submit bills on a monthly basis to the Inquiry Secretariat. Those bills should contain the following:

(i) A breakdown of the number of hours worked by each person on each day specifying, in each case, the area of work undertaken. It will make assessment easier if this is done by reference to the work areas set out in paragraphs 3 to 5 of this Note.

(ii) The hourly rates charged by each person. These hourly rates will be those specified by the Secretary of State in his acceptance of the recommendation or otherwise agreed with the Inquiry Secretariat in advance.

(iii) A list of all disbursements claimed. The prior approval of the Inquiry Secretariat must be obtained in respect of any disbursements in excess of £50. Disbursements in respect of which such approval has not been obtained will not be refunded.

(iv) Where work has been undertaken by counsel, details of his or her fees (supported by fee notes which must specify precisely what work was done and how much time was spent on it).

SECTION FIVE: ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

14. The Secretary of State has delegated to the Inquiry Secretariat and the Treasury Solicitors the task of assessing claims for costs following acceptance of any recommendation. Following an initial assessment by the Inquiry Secretariat, bills of costs will be scrutinised by the Treasury Solicitor's Costs Team.

15. Save in exceptional circumstances costs will be assessed in accordance with the standard basis as follows:

  • Costs will only be allowed which are proportionate to the matter in issue

  • Any doubt as to whether costs have been reasonably incurred or are reasonable or proportionate in amount will be resolved in favour of the paying party.

16. Where agreement cannot be reached between the Inquiry Secretariat or Treasury Solicitor's Costs Team and an Interested Party or Witness on a bill of costs, the Chief Costs Judge will normally be requested to arrange for a Costs Judge to conduct a contested adjudication to determine the matter. This will depend on the Crown and Interested Party or Witness indicating that they are prepared to be bound by the decision of the Costs Judge (as to which see paragraph 12 above).

17. Failure to follow the guidance set out in this note could result in payment being delayed or refused.

Mandy Jacklin
Secretary to the Inquiry
Monday 9 July 2001

 
 home top of page