The Victoria Climbie Inquiry Logo and link to home page  

 

 
 
Search
 
     
Key Documents News Update
Timetables Evidence Background FAQs Inquiry Team About Us Final Report

Overview of contents
Download report
Title pages

Part one Background
1 Introduction
2 The Inquiry
3 Victoria's story

Part two Social Services
4 Ealing Social Services
5 Brent Social Services
6 Haringey Social Services
7 Tottenham Child and Family Centre
8 Enfield Social Services

Part three Health
9 Central Middlesex Hospital
10 North Middlesex Hospital
11 Health analysis
12 general Practice and liaison health visiting

Part four The police
13 brent Child Protection Team
14 Haringey Child Protection Team
15 Child protection policing in north west London

Part five Working with diversity
16 Working with diversity

Part five Learning from experience
17 The seminars
The purpose of the seminars
1 Discovery and inclusion
2 Identification
3 Determining requirements
4 Service provision and delivery
5 Monitoring performance
Seminar conclusions
The need for change

Part six Recommendations
recommendations
Annexes
Annexex Crown Copyright

17 The seminars

Paragraphs: 17.6 - 17.11 | 17.12 - 17.17

Seminar one: Discovery and inclusion

17.6

The first seminar looked at how we can ensure that every child and their carer receive the full range of services they need and to which they are entitled. Most children and their carers come into contact with various agencies that operate nationally and locally. These include education, health, housing, social services, the police and social security. Discussion in this seminar focused on how to make the most of these opportunities to make sure that no child is lost to the system.

17.7

The mobility of England's population can make keeping track of children more difficult. The problem of discovering the existence of children was felt to be particularly acute in areas where children who have just arrived in the country are settled. These difficulties may be made worse by changes in practice of some services; for example, changes in the organisation of the work of health visitors. In addition, it was noted that some sectors of society feel excluded from, or are hostile to, any form of intervention by those whom they see as representing authority.

Keeping track

17.8

There is a well-developed system for recording the birth of a child and for connecting the child with the health visiting service and other health services. It should be noted, however, that organisational changes have affected the work of health visitors, who can often act as the 'eyes and ears' of the community. In the past, the health visiting service was based on geographical boundaries, but this is no longer the case. Under current arrangements, health visitors are mostly attached to GPs and relate to that GP's patient list, regardless of where the patient lives.

17.9

Once the child reaches school age, the health visitor will usually transfer his or her records to the school nurse. However, a school nurse may not always be available and children do not always attend school. Parents are entitled to educate their children at home. If a child has never attended school, as opposed to those who have been withdrawn once they have started, parents are not legally obliged to notify their local education authority of their child's existence. Families who move home are not obliged to inform the authorities of their movements. If parents do not do this, or do not then register the child with the authorities at their new address, it is particularly difficult to keep track of the child. Records held by the local health authority will not necessarily be transferred if the child's new address is not known and, as stated above, parents do not have to enrol their child at school. Therefore, there is no guarantee of successfully keeping track of all children, and there is likely always to be a small number of children who either remain unknown, or become 'lost' to the system.

New arrivals to the country

17.10

The problem in respect of children newly arrived in this country is perhaps more acute. The immigration service takes steps to ensure that information in relation to unaccompanied children arriving in this country is passed to the relevant authorities. An unaccompanied child seeking asylum is referred to the children's panel of the Refugee Council, which then provides support and advice to the child throughout the asylum process. They also ensure that the child is 'plugged into' the social and health services. Some local authorities have established teams that have direct links with the immigration service.

17.11

The situation is rather less satisfactory where children arrive in the UK as part of a 'family'. If a child arrives in the UK with people who appear to be his or her parents, and the immigration officer is satisfied that the family's documentation is genuine and their reason for entering the UK is acceptable, they will be given leave to enter and pass through immigration control. 'Families' who are EU citizens will be subject to only minimal scrutiny, if any at all. In such circumstances, no notification of the child's arrival in the UK is made to health, education or social services. One participant estimated that some 90 million people enter Britain each year, of which about 75 million do so as EU citizens.

Paragraphs: 17.6 - 17.11 | 17.12 - 17.17

Private fostering

17.12

Under current regulations, prospective foster parents must tell the local authority of private foster care arrangements. There is also an obligation on parents who are involved in having a child privately fostered. There is no duty, however, to approve or register private foster parents. It has to be recognised that a large number of children who are privately fostered do not become known to the authorities.

17.13

For children who live with their parents but go to a childminder every day, the position is different. Local authorities must keep a register of childminders and the registration system is based on the person being "fit" to look after children. The local authority must also inspect the premises annually. It is an offence to provide daycare for children without being registered.

17.14

There was general agreement - with which I concur - that this inconsistency in the law should be removed. These issues were fully reported by Sir William Utting in the document People Like Us.

Hostility and exclusion

17.15

It was recognised that children may hesitate or be too frightened to approach agencies who may be able to provide help and support. Indeed, they may go out of their way to avoid identification by such agencies. It was agreed that ways must be found to make it easier for children experiencing difficulties to approach the agencies.

17.16

A number of participants agreed that there would be value in introducing a process whereby all practitioners who come across a child for the first time should, as a matter of routine, make sure they obtain basic information about the child and his or her family. This would include:

the name of the child

age

address

relationship to the primary carer

whether he or she is registered with a GP and if so who

if he or she is of school age, whether or not he or she is enrolled at and attending school.

17.17

This practice should be put into operation across all key agencies and include services such as housing and social security. If the response to any or all of these questions gives rise to concern it should trigger further inquiries. This may appear to be a rather simple suggestion to a complex problem, but on reflection I concluded that it would be yet another easy-to-operate safeguard, and if it secures the well-being of even a handful of children it will have justified itself.

Back to Top

 
  home   top of page