The Victoria Climbie Inquiry Logo and link to home page  

 

 
 
Search
 
     
Key Documents News Update
Timetables Evidence Background FAQs Inquiry Team About Us Final Report

Overview of contents
Download report
Title pages

Part one Background
1 Introduction
2 The Inquiry
3 Victoria's story

Part two Social Services
4 Ealing Social Services
5 Brent Social Services
6 Haringey Social Services
7 Tottenham Child and Family Centre
8 Enfield Social Services

Part three Health
9 Central Middlesex Hospital
10 North Middlesex Hospital
11 Health analysis
12 general Practice and liaison health visiting

Part four The police
13 Brent Child Protection Team
14 Haringey Child Protection Team
15 Child protection policing in north west London
Training
Staff Levels
Equipment
Accommodation
Accountability

Part five Working with diversity
16 Working with diversity

Part five Learning from experience
17 The seminars

Part six Recommendations
recommendations
Annexes
Annexex Crown Copyright

15 Child protection policing in north west London

Paragraphs: 15.27 - 15.40

Equipment

15.27

The Inquiry heard from several witnesses that the CPTs were lacking equipment essential to the proper conduct of their functions. Police vehicles were scarce, computer equipment was outdated and inadequate, and offices were poorly decorated and equipped.

15.28

As to the significance of these deficiencies, I have considerable sympathy with the views of DAC Griffiths who told me, "I do not believe that the lack of provision of resources such as IT, vehicles and so on are actually a reason for not doing your job. Clearly it is desirable for everyone to have the tools they need to do their job but these were not tools that would prevent an officer performing simple, straightforward tasks that are to do with the core role of policing. So whilst I accept the desirability, I do not accept that it is a reason for failing in your duty."

15.29

However, while inadequate facilities may in themselves have had little direct impact on the manner in which Victoria's case was handled, the less tangible effects may have been considerable. I have already expressed the opinion that the CPTs in London were given unacceptably low priority by the MPS as a whole. In addition, the status of the work was low and there was little incentive for high-calibre officers to apply for postings on the teams. The feeling that one's work is not valued or considered important can have a corrosive effect. It damages morale and leads to poor performance. In light of this, and in view of my conclusion that the MPS failed to provide CPTs with adequate equipment of a standard enjoyed by many other branches of the force, I turn briefly to consider the particular deficiencies which were brought to my attention.

Vehicles

15.30

When SO5 was formed in early 2000, the new management team discovered that the 31 CPT sites had only seven police vehicles between them. When one considers that there were approximately 10 staff working from each site, it is clear that this level of provision was inadequate.

15.31

The undesirable consequence of this state of affairs was that officers were obliged, where possible, to use their own cars for police business. In my view, it is wholly inappropriate for officers to be expected to transport detained suspects, or child victims being taken for an interview, in their own private vehicles. Quite apart from the potential insurance difficulties and a lack of necessary equipment (such as child seats), it simply reinforces the impression of a somewhat amateurish and low-priority operation.

15.32

I was very pleased to hear that there are now five times as many vehicles allocated to the CPTs in London as there were in 2000.

Information Technology

15.33

The computer applications used by the MPS at the material time were:

CRIS - a crime recording system

OTIS - an office management system

CRIMINT - a criminal intelligence system.

The evidence I heard indicated that the CPTs were limited in the access they had to all three.

15.34

The problem appears to have been particularly acute with regard to OTIS. Witnesses from all levels of the organisation stated that there were few OTIS terminals readily available to CPT officers. DI Anderson, for example, told me, "What we did not have, unfortunately, was OTIS. You have heard about OTIS, effectively an important telecommunications system within the Metropolitan Police, something which I had asked for personally from the borough we were working for and been refused it, and something which repeated requests I think from all the CPT DIs have been made for, and we were simply assured that yes, we would get it, but the timescale kept getting put back and back."

15.35

A similar picture was painted by Sgt Smith, who said, "I felt very much that we were the poor relations in regard to information technology. A system called OTIS has been mentioned. The OTIS system enables communication throughout London by computers such as email, it allows police notices and orders to be accessible to every police officer in London at the touch of a button. OTIS was introduced in the Metropolitan Police. I know that DI Anderson continued to try to get us access to this, and the information that was fed back to us was that there was a rolling programme and we were at the back end of this rolling programme."

15.36

Even where a particular application was available for use by a CPT, there was no guarantee that it was operationally effective. Sgt Alan Hodges told the Inquiry, "When I arrived at Haringey Child Protection Team they had two computers that were stand-alone systems, very old, liable to break down on a regular basis. The only other system we had was the CRIS system, which was causing us problems at that time, technical problems. We also had access to OTIS but we had one machine in the police station, it was one floor above us, it was not our machine. Again we had link problems with the main server, which virtually made it unusable for our staff.

15.37

When asked about the CRIMINT system, he said, "The problem we had with CRIMINT, it was available to us on that one OTIS machine but it would take 20, 30 minutes to be able to access the system, which was not good enough. We could not spend 20, 30 minutes waiting by a computer waiting for it to warm up."

15.38

PC Karen Jones's experience of using Haringey's CRIS machines was similar. When asked if they were user-friendly, she replied, "No, they would break down. The first one we had was just old, an old machine. The station has stopped using that type of machine. The new one that we got was the newer type that stations were using, but they would still break down, they would often freeze, just lock. You might get the screen and you could not get rid of the screen whatever button you pressed."

15.39

The deficiencies in the IT facilities with which they were provided by the MPS led some CPTs to develop their own individual methods of recording referrals. The most obvious disadvantage of this practice was that it meant that individual CPTs were operating virtually in isolation, unable to share information electronically with their counterparts in other boroughs. Apart from reinforcing the impression of amateurishness surrounding the work of the CPTs, the practical impact of this state of affairs is well illustrated by Victoria's case. None of the officers in Haringey CPT ever became aware, before her death, that Victoria had been the subject of police protection in Brent a mere two weeks before she first came to their attention.

15.40

I was told by Commander Howlett and DCS Kelleher that the MPS is planning to purchase and install systems called PROTECT and MERLIN, which will vastly improve the IT capabilities of the CPTs. I hope that this proves to be the case and that whatever the other advantages of these systems may be, they will facilitate the effective exchange of information between the capital's CPTs. Therefore, I make the following recommendation:

Recommendation

The Police Information Technology Organisation (PITO) should evaluate the child protection IT systems currently available, and make recommendations to chief constables, who must ensure their police force has in use an effective child- protection database and IT management system.

Back to Top

 
  home   top of page